Is demand for early commitments hurting college athletics?

On a day when baseball was making news with Dave Van Horn’s first media appearance since the College World Series, a simple tweet raised a good point that points to a problem.

Arkansas football’s S.J. Tuohy, who does an admirable job keeping up with Chad Morris pretty much all time, had a couple of thoughts on The Twitter that makes one think:

That hits the nail on the head and may be the biggest reason for the deluge of transfers in all sports these days.

In football, a lot of coaches push for commitments at least a year out, sometimes two or three years away. That goes beyond offers and interest, but there are coaches that outright bribe the kids for a verbal commitment.

Fans pick up on it and many of the Lunatic Fringe that every major college football team has goes over the top with it, usually to the point of saying things to these recruits I can guarantee you they wouldn’t want said to their own children.

Assuming, of course, some of these mouth-breathers and booger-eaters are actually allowed to produce offspring. You get the idea a lot of them live in their parents’ garage, eating Cheetos and pounding energy drinks all day.

It is a valid point that apparently has risen to the level S.J. feels is getting out of hand in some cases.

His next tweet got to what is likely the root cause of all these transfers, which has become a cottage industry of its own.

Yes, there are coaches that deliver those ultimatums to kids as young as the 9th grade.

“If you’re not willing to commit now, we’re going to move on to another player,” is a line we’ve heard from several folks that has been used.

Granted, I don’t cover the daily ins and outs of the recruiting game. There are guys that do a great job of that elsewhere, but I’ve heard things for several years and, in a couple of instances, seen it directly.

In a way, coaches have created the very thing so many complain about.

There are media that cover the recruiting in-depth, literally on an hourly basis. They start the team rankings two years in advance, which leads to fans getting nervous about where their team ranks, which leads to social media pressure on kids who don’t even have a driver’s license yet being bombarded with pressures by these same fans.

No, that’s not a negative o those ranking sites. It’s news and it’s information.

This didn’t happen years ago. About 40 years ago, the recruiting started about summer, intensified after the regular season and continued through to the next summer. Yes, as late as the 1980’s, SEC teams were still picking up signees in July to start practice in August as a true freshman.

Not any more.

Now players commit to a school, feel pressured to sign, show up and find out, well, that’s not really what they expected and transfer out.

In the past few months, one player started at USC, transferred to Texas, now is back at USC. That’s an extreme case, but it is a real example and points to a problem that is very prevalent in college football and basketball.

Part of it is on the fans. A few go over-the-top and paint an entire school in a negative light by acting like fools on social media.

Another part is on the coaches. They deliver the take-it-or-leave-it line on some kids who then make an uninformed decision. Coaches don’t make the rules, but it does sorta throw out the mantra many claim about how much they care about their players away from what they can do on the field.

But the actual responsible party that has made all this possible is the NCAA, which has turned into a kangaroo court that more or less makes it up as they go along.

That is the body that has allowed this transfer process to get out of control. If you can figure out their reasoning on granting waivers, you’re better than me because it makes zero sense.

The NCAA has allowed all of the responsibility to be placed on the players, some of whom felt pressured by coaches and over-zealous fans to choose the place they landed.

There is no responsibility placed on the schools, some of which run players off to free up more available scholarships.

And a lot of that is caused because the entire process causes coaches to force high school kids to make a decision that will affect the rest of their lives. There are few consequences for schools that have a revolving door.

 

RAZORBACK FOOTBALL

Sat, Sep 5vs North AlabamaW 31-14
Sat, Sep 12@ UtahL, 43-10
Sat, Sep 19Georgia11:00 AM
ABC
Sat, Sep 26TulsaTBA
Sat, Oct 3@ Texas A&MTBA
Sat, Oct 10TennesseeTBA
Sat, Oct 17@ VanderbiltTBA
Sat, Oct 31vs MissouriTBA
Sat, Nov 7@ AuburnTBA
Sat, Nov 14South CarolinaTBA
Sat, Nov 21@ TexasTBA
Sat, Nov 28vs LSUTBA

HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL

OVERALLRecordPts
1.Bentonville (13)2-01551
2.Conway1-11242
3.Benton (1)1-01203
4.Bentonville West (1)2-01065
5.Shiloh Christian (1)2-0996
6.Bryant0-2754
7.Joe T. Robinson2-0597
8.Searcy2-05110
9.North Little Rock2-0489
10.Sylvan Hills2-012
Others receiving votes: Greenwood 10, Fayetteville 7, Van Buren 3, Rogers 3, Greenbrier 2, Pulaski Academy 2, Jonesboro 2, Springdale Har-Ber 1, Elkins 1.
CLASS 7A
1.Bentonville (13)2-0771
2.Conway1-1532
4.Bentonville West (1)2-0404
5.Shiloh Christian (1)2-0345
3.Bryant (1)0-2253
Others receiving votes: North Little Rock 10, Pulaski Academy 1.
CLASS 6A
1.Benton (15)1-0791
2.Searcy (1)2-0622
3.Sylvan Hills2-0433
4.Van Buren2-0154
5.Mountain Home1-1115t
Jonesboro2-0115t
Others receiving votes: El Dorado 10, FS Southside 4, Sheridan 4, Marion 1.
CLASS 5A
1.Joe T. Robinson (15)2-0791
2.Greenwood (1)0-2522
3.Greenbrier1-0443
5.Farmington2-0305
4.Little Rock Parkview1-1144
Others receiving votes: HS Lakeside 10, Valley View 5, Jacksonville 4, Morrilton 2.
CLASS 4A
1.Stuttgart (13)2-0751
2.Elkins (2)2-0482
3.Nashville (1)2-0434
4.Bauxite2-0215t
5.Gosnell2-0145t
Others receiving votes: Gravette 11, Arkadelphia 8, Ozark 6, Warren 6, Fountain Lake 4, Lonoke 3, Pottsville 1.


CLASS 3A
1.Fordyce (11)0-1701
2.Mansfield (1)1-1412
3.Glen Rose1-1294
4.Bismarck1-1273
5.Prescott (3)2-0215t
Others receiving votes: Walnut Ridge (1) 19, Rivercrest 19, Smackover 7, Rison 3, Newport 2, Cedarville 1, Helena-West Helena 1.
CLASS 2A
1.Mount Ida (9)2-0722
2.Junction City (5)1-1601
3.Baptist Prep (1)2-0234t
4.Des Arc1-119
5.Earle (1)2-017
Others receiving votes: Bigelow 9, East Poinsett County (1) 8, Hector 7, Des Arc 6, Earle 6, Magnet Cove 4, Poyen 3, Marked Tree 2, Dierks 2, Cross County 1, Hazen 1.
8-MAN SANCTIONED
1.Corning (5)2-0252t
2.Cedar Ridge (7)2-0241
3.Woodlawn (1)1-014
Others receiving votes: Magazine 7, Strong (1) 6, Izard County 5, Lafayette County 1, Johnson County Westside 1.