Aggies may be only ones not seeing $$$ with Texas, OU in SEC

The only people who really know what’s going on with the SEC, Texas and Oklahoma flirting with each other aren’t talking.

Nobody doing the talking right now really knows.

But the general attitude from published reports is Texas A&M may be the only person who’s raising any serious objections, which makes you wonder if that’s just for public relations purposes.

Even the president a decade ago that negotiated the whole thing, R. Bowen Loftin, is hollering about some unwritten “gentleman’s agreement” that should be completely binding.

“There’s this understanding among the membership — at least it was 10 years ago —‚ that you don’t admit a school from the same state as a member school unless that member school’s OK with it,” Loftin told ESPN.com on Thursday. “We talked about it from time to time among ourselves, that this was the way it was going to be, that if we had another school in Texas wanting to enter the SEC, Texas A&M would have veto power.”

It didn’t even pass the giggle test then and sure doesn’t in the current financial climate of college athletics.

The arms race in college athletics has arrived. A global pandemic has altered the budgets of every institution and nobody knows exactly what’s going to happen in the future.

Sorry, but any “gentleman’s agreement” over a decade ago really isn’t going to carry a lot of weight when the financial situation has changed so dramatically.

While television money is still the biggest driver of revenue in this conference arms race, it’s vastly different than 10 years ago. Now everybody is chasing the streaming dollars, which is the current wave that’s still getting bigger and shows no signs of washing out anytime soon.

There aren’t 10 teams in all of college sports that draws more national eyeballs to some sort of screen than either the Longhorns or the Sooners. No pair of teams could have the draw of those two being paired together.

Texas is No. 1 in athletic revenue and Oklahoma is either No. 7 or 8, depending on who you want to believe.

The Aggies are either second or third with hopes and dreams of taking over the top spot so it’s not hard to understand why they don’t want the Longhorns. Whether they want to admit it or not there are still some who have a massive inferiority complex to Texas that has been a little ridiculous for a few decades now.

Nobody seems to think league-wide approval will be a big deal.

“The votes are there,” Houston-Chronicle reporter Brent Zwenerman told our Tye Richardson on Thursday. He’s been right on these things for over a decade.

The general consensus among the speculation is Texas and Oklahoma would join a re-arranged SEC West along with Missouri while Alabama and Auburn head to the East, a move that probably won’t thrill some coaches over there.

It does give both Texas and ESPN a way to wiggle out of the financial boondoggle of the Longhorn Network (SEC Network 2 has actually been mentioned). With OU’s Sooner Sports Network it opens up a way for third-tier rights fees on the streaming channels, which is the most important financial part of the future.

From a logistics standpoint everything makes sense. In financial terms it makes even more cents.

And that’s the biggest reason that it could actually happen.

RAZORBACK FOOTBALL

Sat, Sep 5vs North AlabamaW 31-14
Sat, Sep 12@ UtahL, 43-10
Sat, Sep 19Georgia11:00 AM
ABC
Sat, Sep 26TulsaTBA
Sat, Oct 3@ Texas A&MTBA
Sat, Oct 10TennesseeTBA
Sat, Oct 17@ VanderbiltTBA
Sat, Oct 31vs MissouriTBA
Sat, Nov 7@ AuburnTBA
Sat, Nov 14South CarolinaTBA
Sat, Nov 21@ TexasTBA
Sat, Nov 28vs LSUTBA

HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL

OVERALLRecordPts
1.Bentonville (13)2-01551
2.Conway1-11242
3.Benton (1)1-01203
4.Bentonville West (1)2-01065
5.Shiloh Christian (1)2-0996
6.Bryant0-2754
7.Joe T. Robinson2-0597
8.Searcy2-05110
9.North Little Rock2-0489
10.Sylvan Hills2-012
Others receiving votes: Greenwood 10, Fayetteville 7, Van Buren 3, Rogers 3, Greenbrier 2, Pulaski Academy 2, Jonesboro 2, Springdale Har-Ber 1, Elkins 1.
CLASS 7A
1.Bentonville (13)2-0771
2.Conway1-1532
4.Bentonville West (1)2-0404
5.Shiloh Christian (1)2-0345
3.Bryant (1)0-2253
Others receiving votes: North Little Rock 10, Pulaski Academy 1.
CLASS 6A
1.Benton (15)1-0791
2.Searcy (1)2-0622
3.Sylvan Hills2-0433
4.Van Buren2-0154
5.Mountain Home1-1115t
Jonesboro2-0115t
Others receiving votes: El Dorado 10, FS Southside 4, Sheridan 4, Marion 1.
CLASS 5A
1.Joe T. Robinson (15)2-0791
2.Greenwood (1)0-2522
3.Greenbrier1-0443
5.Farmington2-0305
4.Little Rock Parkview1-1144
Others receiving votes: HS Lakeside 10, Valley View 5, Jacksonville 4, Morrilton 2.
CLASS 4A
1.Stuttgart (13)2-0751
2.Elkins (2)2-0482
3.Nashville (1)2-0434
4.Bauxite2-0215t
5.Gosnell2-0145t
Others receiving votes: Gravette 11, Arkadelphia 8, Ozark 6, Warren 6, Fountain Lake 4, Lonoke 3, Pottsville 1.


CLASS 3A
1.Fordyce (11)0-1701
2.Mansfield (1)1-1412
3.Glen Rose1-1294
4.Bismarck1-1273
5.Prescott (3)2-0215t
Others receiving votes: Walnut Ridge (1) 19, Rivercrest 19, Smackover 7, Rison 3, Newport 2, Cedarville 1, Helena-West Helena 1.
CLASS 2A
1.Mount Ida (9)2-0722
2.Junction City (5)1-1601
3.Baptist Prep (1)2-0234t
4.Des Arc1-119
5.Earle (1)2-017
Others receiving votes: Bigelow 9, East Poinsett County (1) 8, Hector 7, Des Arc 6, Earle 6, Magnet Cove 4, Poyen 3, Marked Tree 2, Dierks 2, Cross County 1, Hazen 1.
8-MAN SANCTIONED
1.Corning (5)2-0252t
2.Cedar Ridge (7)2-0241
3.Woodlawn (1)1-014
Others receiving votes: Magazine 7, Strong (1) 6, Izard County 5, Lafayette County 1, Johnson County Westside 1.