Connect with us

Latest News

Yurachek keeping coach search a mystery, which is why we know nothing

Arkansas’ mystery search continues, but money doesn’t appear to be much of an object and a pretty good jumpstart to recruiting is already attending classes and workouts.

Published

on

If nothing else, Arkansas’ search for a new football coach has publicly shown that, well, the circle that knows anything is small and doesn’t tell anyone anything.

Which, of course, leads to wild speculation among a fan base used to more leaks more from a search than a rusted boat. It appears if any big booster says anything, it’s either a wishlist or an outright wild guess.

And, we’re told by people who won’t give any names or locations, the planes being used for all this are owned by individual boosters who do not even live in Arkansas, which means the planes aren’t registered here.

Our own John Nabors may have to tweak his plane-tracking algorithm with this info.

There were people telling me Tuesday the Razorback Foundation was visiting with some higher-dollar donors and, while they weren’t disclosing any names, they were assuring them that paying the coach was not going to be a problem.

Yes, that could put the Hogs into the $6 million range for a coach.

And, no, Mike Leach may not have turned down anything … yet, anyway. One of the hot rumors going around was Leach had wanted in the $5-6 million range, which it was speculated as being out of the budget.

According to some folks Tuesday, that is not accurate. There were some reports that Hunter Yurachek and his band of merry interviewers have recently interviewed Leach.

One old-school type of logic says if a coach is not coaching a conference title game, why not announce it immediately and everybody get to work, but I’ve believed all along there wouldn’t be any sort of announcement until right around the SEC Championship Game this weekend.

Teams do that, by the way, to maximize the publicity, although in today’s world you have to wonder if that’s not a little out-dated.

Following my theory, we have a window from Wednesday-Sunday for the announcement of a coach with a press conference coming next week.

Recruiting for the early signing period got shot down the drain when the last coach was fired. But that doesn’t mean it’s that big of a deal because the new coach will have to recruit the 17 redshirt freshmen already on campus.

Most people tend to miss that. There are 17 freshmen that will still be freshmen next season that are currently in school and available for spring practice with a year of practicing with a college team.

It almost reminds me of when Jimmy Johnson basically got a truckload of draft picks from the Minnesota Vikings and used it to build a team that won three Super Bowls in four years.

No, I’m not saying the Hogs will win national championships with those freshmen, but it gives you one heckuva jumpstart on recruiting without counting against the 25 you can sign.

They’ll still have four years of eligibility, so what is the difference at this point? The new coach will still be able to sign some players, get some transfers and the usual merry-go-round of today’s college athletics.

But I’m hearing the UA is willing to spend the type money necessary to meet todays ridiculous market with a pool for assistants to get some big names.

Now, don’t ask me for the names without churning up a bunch that everybody else is throwing out there. I don’t know and haven’t heard from anyone in a position to know.

The truth is we’ll probably get an indication from the school the coach is leaving because they tend to not be particularly concerned abount covering for Arkansas once they find out their coach is leaving.

With the most recent hiring (men’s basketball coach Eric Musselman), the leaks came from Nevada, not anybody in Fayetteville.

The guess here is the same thing happens with the football search.

Advertisement

2024 Razorbacks Football

Thu, Aug 29vs UAPB (Little Rock)W, 70-0
Sat, Sep 7@ Oklahoma StateL, 31-39 2OT
Sat, Sep 14vs UABW, 37-27
Sat, Sep 21@ AuburnW, 24-14
Sat, Sep 28vs Texas A&M (Arl)L, 21-17
Sat, Oct 5vs TennesseeW, 19-14
Sat, Oct 19vs LSUL, 34-10
Sat, Oct 26@ Mississippi StateW, 58-25
Sat, Nov 2vs Ole Miss11:00 AM
ESPN
Sat, Nov 16vs Texas11:00 AM
Sat, Nov 23vs Louisiana TechTBD
ESPN+/SECN+
Sat, Nov 30@ MissouriTBD
Advertisement

Advertisement

2024 High School Rankings

Following is the Arkansas Sports Media High School Football Poll including the Overall Top 10, the top five in Classes 7A, 6A, 5A, 4A, 3A and 2A, plus the top three in the 8-man division, as voted by a panel of sports media from around the state for the week ending August 24. Ranking is given with first-place votes received, records, total points and ranking from last week's poll:
OVERALLRecordPtsPrv
1.Bryant (18)8-02521
2.Conway (6)8-02302
3.Greenwood (2)8-02103
4.Little Rock Parkview7-11714
5.Bentonville5-31416
6.Benton7-11265
7.Fayetteville6-21008
8.Pulaski Academy6-2757
9.Rogers5-3459
10.Shiloh Christian6-24010
Others receiving votes: Marion 13, Valley View 9, Joe T Robinson 8, Mountain Home 4, Cabot 3, Elkins 3.
CLASS 7A
1.Bryant (20)8-01241
2.Conway (6)8-01052
3.Bentonville5-3753
4.Fayetteville6-2455
5.Pulaski Academy6-2354
Others receiving votes: Rogers 5.
CLASS 6A
1.Greenwood (26)8-01301
2.Benton7-11022
3.Shiloh Christian6-2713
4.Marion7-1524
5.Mountain Home7-131
Others receiving votes: Little Rock Catholic 4.
CLASS 5A
1.Little Rock Parkview (23)7-11271
2.Joe T Robinson7-1902
3.Valley View (3)8-0803
4.Hot Springs Lakeside7-1484
5.Farmington7-130
Others receiving votes: Camden Fairview 4, Maumelle 4, Morrilton 3, Greenbrier 2, Harding Academy 1.
CLASS 4A
1.Elkins (19)8-01161
2.Arkadelphia (5)6-2792
3.Little Rock Mills (1)8-0703
4.Warren6-2404
5.Malvern (1)8-0315
Others receiving votes: Dardanelle 22, Southside Batesville 11, Mena 8, Bauxite 7, DeWitt 4, Highland 2.
CLASS 3A
4.Bismarck (15)8-01054
5.Fordyce (4)8-0765
Prescott (3)7-1531t
1.Osceola (2)6-149
3.Mayflower (1)8-036
Others receiving votes: Booneville (1) 31, Rivercrest 19, Mansfield 14, Charleston 4, Rison 3.
CLASS 2A
1.Carlisle (21)8-01211
2.Conway Christian (4)8-01042
3.Des Arc7-1663
4.Bigelow (1)6-2455
5.Murfreesboro6-230
Others receiving votes: Marked Tree 10, Mineral Springs 6, Junction City 5, Cross County 1, Mount Ida 1, Poyen 1
8-MAN SANCTIONED
1.Strong-Huttig (25)5-0761
2.Midland (1)7-0502
3.Cedar Ridge7-1253
Others receiving votes: Rector 5.

© COPYRIGHT 2017-24 BY PEARSON BROADCASTING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ESPN ARKANSAS 99.5 IN FAYETTEVILLE, 95.3 IN THE RIVER VALLEY, 96.3 IN HOT SPRINGS, 104.3 IN HARRISON-MOUNTAIN HOME.